Artificial intelligence can now write texts, compose music, generate photographs and create designs in just a few seconds. As technology continues to push the boundaries of what is possible, an increasingly important question emerges: what makes human creativity special, and can the value of artistic work be reduced to the final result alone?
HEDONIST
magazine revisits one of the events that sparked debate about the relationship
between art and technology. In 2018, the portrait Edmond de Belamy, created
with the assistance of an algorithm, was sold at Christie's auction house in
New York for $432,500.
The
sale demonstrated that artwork produced with the help of artificial
intelligence could attract considerable attention and command a high price on
the art market. At the same time, it raised questions about authorship,
originality and who deserves recognition for the work involved in creating such
pieces.
Similar
dilemmas have emerged in photography and music. AI-generated images have won
awards, while digitally created voices resembling those of famous musicians
have demonstrated how easily artificial intelligence can produce content that
audiences might mistake for the real thing.
FASTER AND MORE ACCESSIBLE, BUT IS IT MORE ORIGINAL?
One
of the greatest advantages of artificial intelligence is its ability to
accelerate the creative process and make tools accessible to a much wider range
of people.
However,
content that appears convincing is not necessarily original. Research suggests
that artificial intelligence can help individuals develop more creative ideas,
but that the results produced by different people using these tools can also
become increasingly similar.
This
raises an important question: does technology encourage creativity, or does it
subtly steer us towards content that is already familiar, accepted and
expected?
TECHNOLOGY IS CHANGING ART, BUT IT DOES NOT HAVE TO ELIMINATE IT
The
fear that new technology will threaten traditional forms of creativity is
nothing new. The invention of photography once raised concerns among painters,
yet it also opened the door to new artistic movements and different forms of
expression.
A
similar transformation took place in watchmaking. More precise and affordable
quartz movements reshaped the market, while mechanical watches retained their
value through craftsmanship, tradition and the time invested in their
production.
These
examples demonstrate that technological progress does not necessarily erase the
value of human work. Sometimes, the very things machines can replace become
even more highly valued by people.
HUMAN EXPERIENCE AS A MEASURE OF VALUE
Although artificial intelligence can produce a text or melody that evokes emotions, an important question remains: is an artwork simply what we see and hear, or does the story behind it matter just as much?
Sevdalinka,
the traditional urban folk song associated with Bosnia and Herzegovina, is more
than a combination of melody and lyrics. Its value often lies in lived
experience, memory, loss and the emotions conveyed by the performer to the
audience.
This
is precisely where an opportunity emerges to reflect on the limits of
technology. Human creativity is not based solely on technical skill, but also
on personal experience, intention, risk and the willingness to express
something that is not already known or predictable.
WHO IS BEHIND THE WORK?
The
development of artificial intelligence is also changing how authorship and
responsibility are understood. When a work is created with the assistance of an
algorithm, questions arise about who its author is, who deserves recognition
and who is accountable for its content.
The
debate surrounding artificial intelligence is therefore not simply about what
technology can do, but also about how society values human contribution.
Perhaps
the most important question is not what humans can still do better than
machines, but why it matters to us who is behind a particular creation.
In
a world where texts, images and music can be generated in seconds, the
distinctive value of human creativity may increasingly lie in authenticity,
personal experience and the responsibility of the creator.
The
result may be convincing, but the story of who created it and why may still be
what gives it its unique value.